flask-sprint/manifestos/2015_Xenofeminist_manifesto_[EN].txt

Xenofeminist manifesto •
http://www.laboriacuboniks.net/ •
Laboria Cuboniks •
2015 •

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= •
     __  __                 __                _       _               
     \ \/ /___ _ __   ___  / _| ___ _ __ ___ (_)_ __ (_)___ _ __ ___  
      \  // _ \ '_ \ / _ \| |_ / _ \ '_ ` _ \| | '_ \| / __| '_ ` _ \ 
      /  \  __/ | | | (_) |  _|  __/ | | | | | | | | | \__ \ | | | | |
     /_/\_\___|_| |_|\___/|_|  \___|_| |_| |_|_|_| |_|_|___/_| |_| |_|
 •
-=-=-=-= A POLITICS FOR ALIENATION =-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Laboria Cuboniks =-=-=-= •



ZERO •


0x00 Ours is a world in vertigo. It is a world that swarms with 
technological mediation, interlacing our daily lives with abstraction, 
virtuality, and complexity. XF constructs a feminism adapted to these 
realities: a feminism of unprecedented cunning, scale, and vision; a future 
in which the realization of gender justice and feminist emancipation 
contribute to a universalist politics assembled from the needs of every 
human, cutting across race, ability, economic standing, and geographical 
position.  No more futureless repetition on the treadmill of capital, no more 
submission to the drudgery of labour, productive and reproductive alike, no 
more reification of the given masked as critique.  Our future requires 
depetrification.  XF is not a bid for revolution, but a wager on the long 
game of history, demanding imagination, dexterity and persistence. 


0x01 XF seizes alienation as an impetus to generate new worlds.  We are all 
alienated -- but have we ever been otherwise? It is through, and not 
despite, our alienated condition that we can free ourselves from the muck of 
immediacy.  Freedom is not a given -- and it's certainly not given by anything 
'natural'.  The construction of freedom involves not less but more 
alienation; alienation is the labour of freedom's construction.  Nothing 
should be accepted as fixed, permanent, or 'given' -- neither material 
conditions nor social forms.  XF mutates, navigates and probes every horizon.  
Anyone who's been deemed 'unnatural' in the face of reigning biological 
norms, anyone who's experienced injustices wrought in the name of natural 
order, will realize that the glorification of 'nature' has nothing to offer 
us -- the queer and trans among us, the differently-abled, as well as those who 
have suffered discrimination due to pregnancy or duties connected to 
child-rearing.  XF is vehemently anti-naturalist.  Essentialist naturalism 
reeks of theology -- the sooner it is exorcised, the better. 


0x02 Why is there so little explicit, organized effort to repurpose 
technologies for progressive gender political ends? XF seeks to 
strategically deploy existing technologies to re-engineer the world.  Serious 
risks are built into these tools; they are prone to imbalance, abuse, and 
exploitation of the weak.  Rather than pretending to risk nothing, XF 
advocates the necessary assembly of techno-political interfaces responsive 
to these risks.  Technology isn't inherently progressive.  Its uses are fused 
with culture in a positive feedback loop that makes linear sequencing, 
prediction, and absolute caution impossible.  Technoscientific innovation 
must be linked to a collective theoretical and political thinking in which 
women, queers, and the gender non-conforming play an unparalleled role. 

 
0x03 The real emancipatory potential of technology remains unrealized.  Fed 
by the market, its rapid growth is offset by bloat, and elegant innovation 
is surrendered to the buyer, whose stagnant world it decorates.  Beyond the 
noisy clutter of commodified cruft, the ultimate task lies in engineering 
technologies to combat unequal access to reproductive and pharmacological 
tools, environmental cataclysm, economic instability, as well as dangerous 
forms of unpaid/underpaid labour.  Gender inequality still characterizes the 
fields in which our technologies are conceived, built, and legislated for, 
while female workers in electronics (to name just one industry) perform some 
of the worst paid, monotonous and debilitating labour.  Such injustice 
demands structural, machinic and ideological correction. 


0x04 Xenofeminism is a rationalism.  To claim that reason or rationality is 
'by nature' a patriarchal enterprise is to concede defeat.  It is true that 
the canonical 'history of thought' is dominated by men, and it is male hands 
we see throttling existing institutions of science and technology.  But this 
is precisely why feminism must be a rationalism -- because of this miserable 
imbalance, and not despite it.  There is no 'feminine' rationality, nor is 
there a 'masculine' one.  Science is not an expression but a suspension of 
gender.  If today it is dominated by masculine egos, then it is at odds with 
itself -- and this contradiction can be leveraged.  Reason, like information, 
wants to be free, and patriarchy cannot give it freedom.  Rationalism must 
itself be a feminism.  XF marks the point where these claims intersect in a 
two-way dependency.  It names reason as an engine of feminist emancipation, 
and declares the right of everyone to speak as no one in particular. 


INTERRUPT •


0x05 The excess of modesty in feminist agendas of recent decades is not 
proportionate to the monstrous complexity of our reality, a reality 
crosshatched with fibre-optic cables, radio and microwaves, oil and gas 
pipelines, aerial and shipping routes, and the unrelenting, simultaneous 
execution of millions of communication protocols with every passing 
millisecond.  Systematic thinking and structural analysis have largely fallen 
by the wayside in favour of admirable, but insufficient struggles, bound to 
fixed localities and fragmented insurrections.  Whilst capitalism is 
understood as a complex and ever-expanding totality, many would-be emancipat-
tory anti-capitalist projects remain profoundly fearful of transitioning to
the universal, resisting big-picture speculative politics by condemning them
as necessarily oppressive vectors.  Such a false guarantee treats universals
as absolute, generating a debilitating disjuncture between the thing we seek
to depose and the strategies we advance to depose it. 


0x06 Global complexity opens us to urgent cognitive and ethical demands.  
These are Promethean responsibilities that cannot pass unaddressed.  Much of 
twenty-first century feminism -- from the remnants of postmodern identity 
politics to large swathes of contemporary ecofeminism -- struggles to 
adequately address these challenges in a manner capable of producing 
substantial and enduring change.  Xenofeminism endeavours to face up to these 
obligations as collective agents capable of transitioning between multiple 
levels of political, material and conceptual organization. 


0x07 We are adamantly synthetic, unsatisfied by analysis alone.  XF urges 
constructive oscillation between description and prescription to mobilize 
the recursive potential of contemporary technologies upon gender, sexuality 
and disparities of power.  Given that there are a range of gendered 
challenges specifically relating to life in a digital age -- from sexual 
harassment via social media, to doxxing, privacy, and the protection of 
online images -- the situation requires a feminism at ease with computation.  
Today, it is imperative that we develop an ideological infrastructure that 
both supports and facilitates feminist interventions within connective, 
networked elements of the contemporary world.  Xenofeminism is about more 
than digital self-defence and freedom from patriarchal networks.  We want to 
cultivate the exercise of positive freedom -- freedom-to rather than simply 
freedom-from -- and urge feminists to equip themselves with the skills to 
redeploy existing technologies and invent novel cognitive and material tools 
in the service of common ends. 
 

0x08 The radical opportunities afforded by developing (and alienating) forms 
of technological mediation should no longer be put to use in the exclusive 
interests of capital, which, by design, only benefits the few.  There are 
incessantly proliferating tools to be annexed, and although no one can claim 
their comprehensive accessibility, digital tools have never been more widely 
available or more sensitive to appropriation than they are today.  This is 
not an elision of the fact that a large amount of the world's poor is 
adversely affected by the expanding technological industry (from factory 
workers labouring under abominable conditions to the Ghanaian villages that 
have become a repository for the e-waste of the global powers) but an 
explicit acknowledgement of these conditions as a target for elimination.  
Just as the invention of the stock market was also the invention of the 
crash, Xenofeminism knows that technological innovation must equally 
anticipate its systemic condition responsively. 


TRAP •


0x09 XF rejects illusion and melancholy as political inhibitors.  Illusion, 
as the blind presumption that the weak can prevail over the strong with no 
strategic coordination, leads to unfulfilled promises and unmarshalled 
drives.  This is a politics that, in wanting so much, ends up building so 
little.  Without the labour of large-scale, collective social organisation, 
declaring one's desire for global change is nothing more than wishful 
thinking.  On the other hand, melancholy -- so endemic to the left -- teaches 
us that emancipation is an extinct species to be wept over and that blips of 
negation are the best we can hope for.  At its worst, such an attitude 
generates nothing but political lassitude, and at its best, installs an 
atmosphere of pervasive despair which too often degenerates into factionalism
and petty moralizing.  The malady of melancholia only compounds political
inertia, and -- under the guise of being realistic -- relinquishes all 
hope of calibrating the world otherwise.   It is against such maladies that 
XF innoculates. 


0x0A We take politics that exclusively valorize the local in the guise of 
subverting currents of global abstraction, to be insufficient.  To secede 
from or disavow capitalist machinery will not make it disappear.  Likewise, 
suggestions to pull the lever on the emergency brake of embedded velocities, 
the call to slow down and scale back, is a possibility available only to the 
few -- a violent particularity of exclusivity -- ultimately entailing catas-
trophe for the many.  Refusing to think beyond the microcommunity, to foster 
connections between fractured insurgencies, to consider how emancipatory 
tactics can be scaled up for universal implementation, is to remain 
satisfied with temporary and defensive gestures.  XF is an affirmative 
creature on the offensive, fiercely insisting on the possibility of 
large-scale social change for all of our alien kin. 


0x0B A sense of the world's volatility and artificiality seems to have faded 
from contemporary queer and feminist politics, in favour of a plural but 
static constellation of gender identities, in whose bleak light equations of 
the good and the natural are stubbornly restored.  While having (perhaps) 
admirably expanded thresholds of 'tolerance', too often we are told to seek 
solace in unfreedom, staking claims on being 'born' this way, as if offering 
an excuse with nature's blessing.  All the while, the heteronormative centre 
chugs on.  XF challenges this centrifugal referent, knowing full well that 
sex and gender are exemplary of the fulcrum between norm and fact, between 
freedom and compulsion.  To tilt the fulcrum in the direction of nature is a 
defensive concession at best, and a retreat from what makes trans and queer 
politics more than just a lobby: that it is an arduous assertion of freedom 
against an order that seemed immutable.  Like every myth of the given, a 
stable foundation is fabulated for a real world of chaos, violence, and 
doubt.  The 'given' is sequestered into the private realm as a certainty, 
whilst retreating on fronts of public consequences.  When the possibility of 
transition became real and known, the tomb under Nature's shrine cracked, 
and new histories -- bristling with futures -- escaped the old order of 'sex'.
The disciplinary grid of gender is in no small part an attempt to mend that 
shattered foundation, and tame the lives that escaped it.  The time has now 
come to tear down this shrine entirely, and not bow down before it in a 
piteous apology for what little autonomy has been won. 


0x0C If 'cyberspace' once offered the promise of escaping the strictures of 
essentialist identity categories, the climate of contemporary social media 
has swung forcefully in the other direction, and has become a theatre where 
these prostrations to identity are performed.  With these curatorial 
practices come puritanical rituals of moral maintenance, and these stages 
are too often overrun with the disavowed pleasures of accusation, shaming, 
and denunciation.  Valuable platforms for connection, organization, and 
skill-sharing become clogged with obstacles to productive debate positioned 
as if they are debate.  These puritanical politics of shame -- which fetishize 
oppression as if it were a blessing, and cloud the waters in moralistic 
frenzies -- leave us cold.  We want neither clean hands nor beautiful souls, 
neither virtue nor terror.  We want superior forms of corruption. 


0x0D What this shows is that the task of engineering platforms for social 
emancipation and organization cannot ignore the cultural and semiotic 
mutations these platforms afford.  What requires reengineering are the 
memetic parasites arousing and coordinating behaviours in ways occluded by 
their hosts' self-image; failing this, memes like 'anonymity', 'ethics', 
'social justice' and 'privilege-checking' host social dynamisms at odds with 
the often-commendable intentions with which they're taken up.  The task of 
collective self-mastery requires a hyperstitional manipulation of desire's 
puppet-strings, and deployment of semiotic operators over a terrain of 
highly networked cultural systems.  The will will always be corrupted by the 
memes in which it traffics, but nothing prevents us from instrumentalizing 
this fact, and calibrating it in view of the ends it desires. 


PARITY •


0x0E Xenofeminism is gender-abolitionist.  'Gender abolitionism' is not code 
for the eradication of what are currently considered 'gendered' traits from 
the human population.  Under patriarchy, such a project could only spell 
disaster -- the notion of what is 'gendered' sticks disproportionately to the 
feminine.  But even if this balance were redressed, we have no interest in 
seeing the sexuate diversity of the world reduced.  Let a hundred sexes 
bloom! 'Gender abolitionism' is shorthand for the ambition to construct a 
society where traits currently assembled under the rubric of gender, no 
longer furnish a grid for the asymmetric operation of power.  'Race 
abolitionism' expands into a similar formula -- that the struggle must continue 
until currently racialized characteristics are no more a basis of 
discrimination than than the color of one's eyes.  Ultimately, every 
emancipatory abolitionism must incline towards the horizon of class 
abolitionism, since it is in capitalism where we encounter oppression in its 
transparent, denaturalized form: you're not exploited or oppressed because 
you are a wage labourer or poor; you are a labourer or poor because you are 
exploited. 


0x0F Xenofeminism understands that the viability of emancipatory 
abolitionist projects -- the abolition of class, gender, and race -- hinges on a 
profound reworking of the universal.  The universal must be grasped as 
generic, which is to say, intersectional.  Intersectionality is not the 
morcellation of collectives into a static fuzz of cross-referenced 
identities, but a political orientation that slices through every 
particular, refusing the crass pigeonholing of bodies.  This is not a 
universal that can be imposed from above, but built from the bottom up  --  
or, better, laterally, opening new lines of transit across an uneven 
landscape.  This non-absolute, generic universality must guard against the 
facile tendency of conflation with bloated, unmarked particulars -- namely 
Eurocentric universalism -- whereby the male is mistaken for the sexless, the 
white for raceless, the cis for the real, and so on.  Absent such a 
universal, the abolition of class will remain a bourgeois fantasy, the 
abolition of race will remain a tacit white-supremacism, and the abolition 
of gender will remain a thinly veiled misogyny, even -- especially -- when 
prosecuted by avowed feminists themselves.  (The absurd and reckless 
spectacle of so many self-proclaimed 'gender abolitionists'' campaign 
against trans women is proof enough of this. )


0x10 From the postmoderns, we have learnt to burn the facades of the false 
universal and dispel such confusions; from the moderns, we have learnt to 
sift new universals from the ashes of the false.  Xenofeminism seeks to 
construct a coalitional politics, a politics without the infection of 
purity.  Wielding the universal requires thoughtful qualification and precise 
self-reflection so as to become a ready-to-hand tool for multiple political 
bodies and something that can be appropriated against the numerous 
oppressions that transect with gender and sexuality.  The universal is no 
blueprint, and rather than dictate its uses in advance, we propose XF as a 
platform.  The very process of construction is therefore understood to be a 
negentropic, iterative, and continual refashioning.  Xenofeminism seeks to be 
a mutable architecture that, like open source software, remains available 
for perpetual modification and enhancement following the navigational 
impulse of militant ethical reasoning.  Open, however, does not mean 
undirected.  The most durable systems in the world owe their stability to the 
way they train order to emerge as an 'invisible hand' from apparent 
spontaneity; or exploit the inertia of investment and sedimentation.  We 
should not hesitate to learn from our adversaries or the successes and 
failures of history.  With this in mind, XF seeks ways to seed an order that 
is equitable and just, injecting it into the geometry of freedoms these 
platforms afford. 


ADJUST •


0x11 Our lot is cast with technoscience, where nothing is so sacred that it 
cannot be reengineered and transformed so as to widen our aperture of 
freedom, extending to gender and the human.  To say that nothing is sacred, 
that nothing is transcendent or protected from the will to know, to tinker 
and to hack, is to say that nothing is supernatural.  'Nature' -- understood 
here, as the unbounded arena of science -- is all there is.  And so, in tearing 
down melancholy and illusion; the unambitious and the non-scaleable; the 
libidinized puritanism of certain online cultures, and Nature as an 
un-remakeable given, we find that our normative anti-naturalism has pushed 
us towards an unflinching ontological naturalism.  There is nothing, we 
claim, that cannot be studied scientifically and manipulated 
technologically. 


0x12 This does not mean that the distinction between the ontological and the 
normative, between fact and value, is simply cut and dried.  The vectors of 
normative anti-naturalism and ontological naturalism span many ambivalent 
battlefields.  The project of untangling what ought to be from what is, of 
dissociating freedom from fact, will from knowledge, is, indeed, an infinite 
task.  There are many lacunae where desire confronts us with the brutality of 
fact, where beauty is indissociable from truth.  Poetry, sex, technology and 
pain are incandescent with this tension we have traced.  But give up on the 
task of revision, release the reins and slacken that tension, and these 
filaments instantly dim. 
 

CARRY •


0x13 The potential of early, text-based internet culture for countering 
repressive gender regimes, generating solidarity among marginalised groups, 
and creating new spaces for experimentation that ignited cyberfeminism in 
the nineties has clearly waned in the twenty-first century.  The dominance of 
the visual in today's online interfaces has reinstated familiar modes of 
identity policing, power relations and gender norms in self-representation.  
But this does not mean that cyberfeminist sensibilities belong to the past.  
Sorting the subversive possibilities from the oppressive ones latent in 
today's web requires a feminism sensitive to the insidious return of old 
power structures, yet savvy enough to know how to exploit the potential.  
Digital technologies are not separable from the material realities that 
underwrite them; they are connected so that each can be used to alter the 
other towards different ends.  Rather than arguing for the primacy of the 
virtual over the material, or the material over the virtual, xenofeminism 
grasps points of power and powerlessness in both, to unfold this knowledge 
as effective interventions in our jointly composed reality. 
 

0x14 Intervention in more obviously material hegemonies is just as crucial 
as intervention in digital and cultural ones.  Changes to the built 
environment harbour some of the most significant possibilities in the 
reconfiguration of the horizons of women and queers.  As the embodiment of 
ideological constellations, the production of space and the decisions we 
make for its organization are ultimately articulations about 'us' and 
reciprocally, how a 'we' can be articulated.  With the potential to 
foreclose, restrict, or open up future social conditions, xenofeminists must 
become attuned to the language of architecture as a vocabulary for 
collective choreo-graphy -- the coordinated writing of space. 


0x15 From the street to the home, domestic space too must not escape our 
tentacles.  So profoundly ingrained, domestic space has been deemed 
impossible to disembed, where the home as norm has been conflated with home 
as fact, as an un-remakeable given.  Stultifying 'domestic realism' has no 
home on our horizon.  Let us set sights on augmented homes of shared 
laboratories, of communal media and technical facilities.  The home is ripe 
for spatial transformation as an integral component in any process of 
feminist futurity.  But this cannot stop at the garden gates.  We see too well 
that reinventions of family structure and domestic life are currently only 
possible at the cost of either withdrawing from the economic sphere -- the way 
of the commune -- or bearing its burdens manyfold -- the way of the single parent.  
If we want to break the inertia that has kept the moribund figure of the 
nuclear family unit in place, which has stubbornly worked to isolate women 
from the public sphere, and men from the lives of their children, while 
penalizing those who stray from it, we must overhaul the material 
infrastructure and break the economic cycles that lock it in place.  The task 
before us is twofold, and our vision necessarily stereoscopic: we must 
engineer an economy that liberates reproductive labour and family life, 
while building models of familiality free from the deadening grind of wage 
labour. 


0x16 From the home to the body, the articulation of a proactive politics for 
biotechnical intervention and hormones presses.  Hormones hack into gender 
systems possessing political scope extending beyond the aesthetic 
calibration of individual bodies.  Thought structurally, the distribution of 
hormones -- who or what this distribution prioritizes or pathologizes -- is of 
paramount import.  The rise of the internet and the hydra of black market 
pharmacies it let loose -- together with a publicly accessible archive of 
endocrinological knowhow -- was instrumental in wresting control of the 
hormonal economy away from 'gatekeeping' institutions seeking to mitigate 
threats to established distributions of the sexual.  To trade in the rule of 
bureaucrats for the market is, however, not a victory in itself.  These tides 
need to rise higher.  We ask whether the idiom of 'gender hacking' is 
extensible into a long-range strategy, a strategy for wetware akin to what 
hacker culture has already done for software -- constructing an entire universe 
of free and open source platforms that is the closest thing to a practicable 
communism many of us have ever seen.  Without the foolhardy endangerment of 
lives, can we stitch together the embryonic promises held before us by 
pharmaceutical 3D printing ('Reactionware'), grassroots telemedical abortion 
clinics, gender hacktivist and DIY-HRT forums, and so on, to assemble a 
platform for free and open source medicine?


0x17 From the global to the local, from the cloud to our bodies, 
xenofeminism avows the responsibility in constructing new institutions of 
technomaterialist hegemonic proportions.  Like engineers who must conceive of 
a total structure as well as the molecular parts from which it is 
constructed, XF emphasises the importance of the mesopolitical sphere 
against the limited effectiveness of local gestures, creation of autonomous 
zones, and sheer horizontalism, just as it stands against transcendent, or 
top-down impositions of values and norms.  The mesopolitical arena of 
xenofeminism's universalist ambitions comprehends itself as a mobile and 
intricate network of transits between these polarities.  As pragmatists, we 
invite contamination as a mutational driver between such frontiers. 


OVERFLOW •


0x18 XF asserts that adapting our behaviour for an era of Promethean 
complexity is a labour requiring patience, but a ferocious patience at odds 
with 'waiting'.  Calibrating a political hegemony or insurgent memeplex not 
only implies the creation of material infra-structures to make the values it 
articulates explicit, but places demands on us as subjects.  How are we to 
become hosts of this new world? How do we build a better semiotic 
parasite -- one that arouses the desires we want to desire, that orchestrates 
not an autophagic orgy of indignity or rage, but an emancipatory and 
egalitarian community buttressed by new forms of unselfish solidarity and 
collective self-mastery?


0x19 Is xenofeminism a programme? Not if this means anything so crude as a 
recipe, or a single-purpose tool by which a determinate problem is solved.  
We prefer to think like the schemer or lisper, who seeks to construct a new 
language in which the problem at hand is immersed, so that solutions for it, 
and for any number of related problems, might unfurl with ease.  Xenofeminism 
is a platform, an incipient ambition to construct a new language for sexual 
politics -- a language that seizes its own methods as materials to be reworked, 
and incrementally bootstraps itself into existence.  We understand that the 
problems we face are systemic and interlocking, and that any chance of 
global success depends on infecting myriad skills and contexts with the 
logic of XF.  Ours is a transformation of seeping, directed subsumption 
rather than rapid overthrow; it is a transformation of deliberate 
construction, seeking to submerge the white-supremacist capitalist 
patriarchy in a sea of procedures that soften its shell and dismantle its 
defenses, so as to build a new world from the scraps. 


0x1A Xenofeminism indexes the desire to construct an alien future with a 
triumphant X on a mobile map.  This X does not mark a destination.  It is the 
insertion of a topological-keyframe for the formation of a new logic.  In 
affirming a future untethered to the repetition of the present, we militate 
for ampliative capacities, for spaces of freedom with a richer geometry than 
the aisle, the assembly line, and the feed.  We need new affordances of 
perception and action unblinkered by naturalised identities.  In the name of 
feminism, 'Nature' shall no longer be a refuge of injustice, or a basis for 
any political justification whatsoever!


If nature is unjust, change nature!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= •